C
C#15mo ago
Denis

✅ How to avoid blocking until all subscribed handlers complete handling an event

I have the following code:
public sealed class MessageBroker
{
private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, byte> m_sentMessages = new();
private readonly Action<MessageMetadata, string> m_onNewMessage;
private readonly FileSystemWatcher m_watcher = new();

public MessageBroker(string exchangePath, Action<MessageMetadata, string> onNewMessage)
{
m_onNewMessage = onNewMessage ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(onNewMessage));

m_watcher.Path = exchangePath;
m_watcher.Filter = "[*]_[*]_[*]_[*]_[*]";
m_watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
m_watcher.IncludeSubdirectories = false;
m_watcher.InternalBufferSize = 16_384;
m_watcher.Created += WatcherOnCreated;
}

private static async ValueTask WaitForFileAsync(string filePath)
{
// Some Async method
}

private async ValueTask ProcessNewMessageAsync(string fullPath)
{
if (m_sentMessages.TryRemove(fullPath, out var _))
return;
if (!MessageHelper.TryParseToMetadata(fullPath, out var metadata) || metadata is null)
return;

await WaitForFileAsync(fullPath).ConfigureAwait(false);

m_onNewMessage(metadata.Value, fullPath);
}

private async void WatcherOnCreated(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
=> await ProcessNewMessageAsync(e.FullPath).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
public sealed class MessageBroker
{
private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, byte> m_sentMessages = new();
private readonly Action<MessageMetadata, string> m_onNewMessage;
private readonly FileSystemWatcher m_watcher = new();

public MessageBroker(string exchangePath, Action<MessageMetadata, string> onNewMessage)
{
m_onNewMessage = onNewMessage ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(onNewMessage));

m_watcher.Path = exchangePath;
m_watcher.Filter = "[*]_[*]_[*]_[*]_[*]";
m_watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
m_watcher.IncludeSubdirectories = false;
m_watcher.InternalBufferSize = 16_384;
m_watcher.Created += WatcherOnCreated;
}

private static async ValueTask WaitForFileAsync(string filePath)
{
// Some Async method
}

private async ValueTask ProcessNewMessageAsync(string fullPath)
{
if (m_sentMessages.TryRemove(fullPath, out var _))
return;
if (!MessageHelper.TryParseToMetadata(fullPath, out var metadata) || metadata is null)
return;

await WaitForFileAsync(fullPath).ConfigureAwait(false);

m_onNewMessage(metadata.Value, fullPath);
}

private async void WatcherOnCreated(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
=> await ProcessNewMessageAsync(e.FullPath).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
The event handler WatcherOnCreated should have very short execution time to avoid overflowing the FileSystemWatcher buffer. I'd like to ask what is the most optimal way of avoiding blocking the FSW when handling the event? I suppose it is running the handler using async void, but from what I understand the execution is blocked until the WaitForFileAsync is awaited, right? Can I await Task.Yield() in the beginning of ProcessNewMessageAsync to avoid blocking sooner?
7 Replies
phaseshift
phaseshift15mo ago
delegates are not great for that because you can only get, at best, one return value from all subscribers. and async void is... :monkas: don't do it unless forced
Denis
DenisOP15mo ago
why would I want to get a return value from an event handler? and isn't async void perfectly reasonable for event handlers?
phaseshift
phaseshift15mo ago
You cant await async void iirc
Denis
DenisOP15mo ago
Yes the internals of FileSystemWatcher just Invoke the event whenever a new file is created and it does not care whether the handler is async or not
phaseshift
phaseshift15mo ago
right, but it's not blocking anything if its async void Or does it still need the first await within it to really go 'true async'?
Denis
DenisOP15mo ago
from my understanding yes, but that is why I'm asking this in the first place
phaseshift
phaseshift15mo ago
ok then yeah I think that's what task.Yield is for
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server