Chamanlal Setia Exports - best effort DD

This is an attempt to create a due diligence post that examines a company from various aspects, and attempts to capture the investment worthiness of the company over time, not just at time of writing. This particular post/comment will initially draw up a blueprint to analyse the company, and will be supplemented with more follow up comments until breadth+depth is achieved. Let's start with analysis of the financial statements. Quarterly results for the past 36 months have been decent. Given the sector the company is operating in (rice), high OPM is not expected, and it shows. Nevertheless, OPM is consistent across time. Given the manner in which company has to procure rice, age it, before selling it to end-users, you could expect a company to slip up on demand forecasting or inventory procurement. But that has not been the case with this company for several quarters. If anything, it shows good execution capabilities of company management. It also demonstrates that despite rice being a commodity, there is scope for a well-run company to eke out a profit. Note, that consistency analysis needs to be done over 60/120 months, to account for cyclicality. It's possible that 36 month analysis is insufficient to deduce whether the business does well irrespective of the phase of the cycle it is in. Sales growth has been positive over 5 and 10 years. Cyclicality is evident, with single digit % growth reported in some years. Balance sheet is strong, with reserves growing faster than debt over years. Cash conversion cycle is on the higher side at roughly 180 days. This is expected given the need to age rice. But, it also implies this is not a true-blue FMCG company that tends to have a negative cash conversion cycle. ROCE Is high with the figure being 20%+ over most years, dipping to 19% on occasion. Shareholding pattern - promoters mostly hold the stock at roughly 73%. Management quality - TBD Valuation - available between 5-10 PE which is expected for this industry.
No description
No description
No description
18 Replies
Unknown User
Unknown User17mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
Institutional holding comes later. For the mcap this company has, there wont be a lot of takers. KRBL and LT Foods have a better "story" for FIIs and DIIs.
Unknown User
Unknown User17mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
Basket of stocks in rice sector instead of just one single company. Easier to bet on basmati rice as a story instead of a single company which comes with its own set of issues. Makes it easier to diversify and reduce risk while trying to get access to the growth story in the sector. This is a triple bagger for me. KRBL isnt. Daawat/LT foods has comparable returns. Risks for people entering now are somewhat different. If you look at KRBL in the same timeframe, you'd have to time the entry to get a comparable return. This, despite being the largest company in the sector with better financial/operational metrics. Low dividend payout is fine. I would expect growing companies that need money to grow, to put money back into the business, and issue dividends/buybacks only to give some degree of comfort to minority shareholders that the cash reserves are real. Easier to command better valuation if the company can find ways to reduce cost of capital for operationally-heavy business, since debt fuelled growth is not necessarily good for shareholders.
Unknown User
Unknown User17mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
Their business strategy is different. So different weight.
Unknown User
Unknown User17mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
samosa
samosa17mo ago
Just guessing: For an Import/Export business, the most likely moats are the contacts and contracts the company has at both ends, the suppliers and the buyers.
samosa
samosa17mo ago
@Berry brought up a point about Govt interference. At present there seems to be no supply-side issue, the govt's "Central Pool" also looks healthy: https://fci.gov.in/stocks.php?view=217
FCI, Food Corporation of India, Govt. of India
Overview | Foodgrains Stocking Norms | Food grains Stock in Central Pool for current year 2016 | Region Wise Stock Position | Foodgrains Stock in Central Pool for Last Five years | Archives
samosa
samosa17mo ago
@vineetr Beyond that, would love to hear about basmati rice exports. You mentioned restricting exports there is a no-go, why is that? The govt and FCI probably doesn't stock basmati rice, I'd imagine that's not going to be on the menu at a ration store So I can understand if they don't care about stock levels and local supply vs exported supply for it
Unknown User
Unknown User17mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
Because govt restrictions on rice export are for the low-value varieties. Basmati is cultivated more like a cash crop. That aside, biggest macro that would work against this sector over next 10-15 years would be climate change that reduces the area under cultivation.
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
No description
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
Rice requires a lot of water. On an avg requiring 2500 lts per kg (figure is not only for basmati). Of course, the water and other resources that goes into rice ends up ensuring more calorific value, compared to most other crops, except corn and soya.
vineetr
vineetr17mo ago
No description
vineetr
vineetr9mo ago
Rise in revenue and profits, despite challenges. Says a lot about current execution ability of management.
No description
vineetr
vineetr9mo ago
Procurement appears to be done mostly against orders, not just on a sales (or demand) forecast. Cost of procurement appears to be on lower side due to the arrangements with financers.
No description
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server