V
VALORANTā€¢2y ago
Axl

Jett fanart

#fanart jett fanart with popstyle
No description
66 Replies
Imperial
Imperialā€¢2y ago
Jettie Eilish
JSN
JSNā€¢2y ago
I couldn't even tell this was ai, it's getting scary
silly goose
silly gooseā€¢2y ago
fr
octodip
octodipā€¢2y ago
how can you not tell
Noob
Noobā€¢2y ago
šŸ‘
JSN
JSNā€¢2y ago
As far as the normal solid signs that I've seen, I couldn't. They usually mess up eyes and certain distinguishable patterns
octodip
octodipā€¢2y ago
the cheek, teeth, lips, ear, and general flat feeling are still there (and the left eye looks a lil wack)
Haasty
Haastyā€¢2y ago
The eyes are messed up And the mouth looks wonky asf
coppu
coppuā€¢2y ago
its the way it all flows, if you look at the random strands of hair they dont make sense, and tbe shadows dont make sense for the level of art i feel like AI art should not be allowed in fanartā€¦
ChickenNugget
ChickenNuggetā€¢2y ago
AI Art still takes work and skill. There isnā€™t a reason it shouldnā€™t be in fanart unless someone is claiming at as something they drew
octodip
octodipā€¢2y ago
it doesnt it steals work and skill
ChickenNugget
ChickenNuggetā€¢2y ago
Yes, it does, it takes skill to figure out how to get that result. Iā€™m not in the mood to argue but anyone who does AI art can tell you of the time and trial and error it takes.
iiireiiireiii
iiireiiireiiiā€¢2y ago
yeah it takes so much time to think of the words im gonna put in my art stealing machine
ChickenNugget
ChickenNuggetā€¢2y ago
I invite you to go to an AI generator and replicate that image then. Be my guest.
silly goose
silly gooseā€¢2y ago
Itā€™s not an art stealing machine
Aloo
Alooā€¢2y ago
You can obv tell its ai cause its garbage and flawed
coppu
coppuā€¢2y ago
Skill ?? go to an AI and write a few prompts ? is that equal to years of learning anatomy and color theory ? a human can at least replicate it again, and do it correctly. youā€™re an artist you should know this
Haasty
Haastyā€¢2y ago
While I do agree with you that making a "good" piece of art traditionally is harder than generating a "good" piece of AI art, nobody was comparing the skill AI art takes with the skill normal art takes. A good majority of AI art is just typing in a single word, but some AI art probably does take some amount skill to make, such as the pieces Reviem posts in this discord (they look fantastic and much different from "normal" AI generated art in my mind). You canā€™t lump in all AI art together just like you canā€™t lump all traditional art together. In addition to that, just because something inherently takes "less skill" doesnā€™t mean its not a cool piece of art. Does it mean that it probably took less time and effort to make/generate? Sure, but its still interesting to look at. I donā€™t particularly see a reason why AI art needs to be banned in this server unless it truly does kind of take over the channel, but as it is right now, AI art in this discord isnā€™t a problem yet. AI art does have its flaws, but just like how most traditional art has its flaws, that doesnā€™t mean its garbage. And you arenā€™t "stealing" by spreading AI art, unless you made/generated an image to imitate/copy an existing piece of art and passed it off as your own work. In my mind as long as you mention its AI generated, and donā€™t intentionally try to deceive people, then its fine for the most part. At the end of the day, in my mind AI generators are a really neat tool that will only get better as time goes on. As someone who enjoys art myself, I canā€™t wait to see how it grows and will influence the art world as a whole. But in the meantime I would try to stay open-minded about new things like these because they definitely arenā€™t going away any time soon lol
coppu
coppuā€¢2y ago
i think it should be posted in another channel to avoid confusion people are starting to use it to scam others into commissioning them
octodip
octodipā€¢2y ago
šŸ’€ bro said clicking buttons is hard the woes of clicking generate over and over again to get an equally mediocre image
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
Ai literally steals art/photography from other artists to make this. A few clicks and you have AI art. Damn thatā€™s some hard work and skill šŸ’€
Aloo
Alooā€¢2y ago
That is the point numb skull. IT IS NOT ART because it takes out bits from tons of other artworks which btw they use to train ai without artist's consent and aren't compensated for it. You can give whatever prompt you want call it skill whatever but it'll be just equivalent to being really good at googling stuff cause thats what it do. Ai is taking tiny bits of existing ones into another image I sound mean Sorry about that but for the love of god educate yourself
Haasty
Haastyā€¢2y ago
so do all artists plagiarize all artists look at other art all artists are influenced by other artists artists take techniques from other artists like George Bridgeman's amazing books on anatomy and such or the Loomis Head method
Aloo
Alooā€¢2y ago
There is a difference between plagiarism and inspiration. You're speaking of bad artists who does that. Artist whenever is inspired, they come up with their own unique touch, human touch which is why we got tons of art styles. No one ever said plagiarism is good. Did you even read what i said? Or are you just trying to prove your point so hard on that you dont give yourself tiniest bit of flexibility to change your opinion about it Its like youre trying to defend bad artist
Haasty
Haastyā€¢2y ago
Yes you are right AI combines together thousands if not millions of images its not stealing any one persons style "bad" artists need to be defended because most artists are "bad" artists If you define the difference between plagiarism and inspiration as the lack of "human touch" then I apologize but we won't get anywhere in this conversation because our definitions of these fundamental concepts are different
silly goose
silly gooseā€¢2y ago
Thank you
Orange ć‚·
Orange ć‚·ā€¢2y ago
Shuuuuuuuush
Deleted User
Deleted Userā€¢2y ago
i could literally tell it was AI the second i saw it the only reason i clicked on this post is because thats AI and i wanted to make fun of the person who posted it This is bad art, its flat, emotionless, has no unique style at all, theres nothing specific that sets this image apart from every other emotionless, bland, copy of it AI art is it's own art style and its absolutely horrendus my guy thinks typing messages until you get an image that looks sorta acceptable is hard work lol
ChickenNugget
ChickenNuggetā€¢2y ago
Look dude, thatā€™s your opinion. Thereā€™s no reason to go around making fun of people who have nothing to do with you.
Aloo
Alooā€¢2y ago
Not opinion. Facts
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
Thanks man I appreciate it. Most people believe AI is just copy and paste parts of people's images without changing them and then composites them together which is simply not true. Just like the human brain, AI works by pattern recognition. If a person sees enough apples and is told they are apples they will be able to identify apples in the future and maybe even reproduce them in drawings. Similarly, AI is trained on the LAION 5b model (5b im assuming means 5 billion)which contains images made by humans( both art and photographs, pretty much any type of image found online) that are available for ANYONE to see on the internet. AI, just like human artists, simply recognises patterns previously seen and then reproduces them. Be it an object, person or style. A lot of people also think the images are taken illegally, and as far as the law goes, simply scraping images on the internet that ANYONE can see and captioning them for training purposes is not illegal. Which is exactly what the LAION 5b model is. There is no legal issue because you cannot copyright an art style. That is not true at all
Aloo
Alooā€¢2y ago
You're clearly someone who's got no idea what creative's job is. Dont bother me
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
You're saying prompting isn't creative? you're saying images never seen before are not creative? you're saying the ability for anyone to turn something they imagined into existence and share it isn't creative? Then explain what it. People complaining how art is made now reminds me of how boomers complain of how things used to be. "Oh back in my day art was made like this..."
Aloo
Alooā€¢2y ago
Shit in blue, nothing like you've seen before but its still shit. Recycling artworks, creating flawed images, outdated boring style, not to mention the ethical aspects of not compensating the artist's work used to train ai. Anything involving that is garbage to me. If it fascinates you good for you. Im only fine as long as someone is using it for absolute initial concepts which are for him to see and only him, like we use references and moodboards for a more clean concept ahead. Passing it off as your own work is so unfair. Use it to make yourself better not cut corners alr. Come back when you've actually experience in creative industry. Actually hopeless, gonna mute this thread
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
Recycling artworks? Seriously? Images are only flawed for now. AI image generation is still experimental. As more models come out, flaws can be easily exterminated. How is it an outdated boring style when you can have any style? Ethical aspects? MF have you never pirated a movie or game ever? Does that compensate the producers? If what you said was the case then EVERY ARTIST would owe money to every other artist. No current style is completely new and is all inspired by other people's styles.
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
I totally agree. I think any legit artist would too lol
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
claiming what exactly?
Ash
Ashā€¢2y ago
Reviem manages the AI to create this, they themself did not create it but instead guided an AI to create it, since an AI cannot claim credit for artwork yes Reviem created it
ChickenNugget
ChickenNuggetā€¢2y ago
This artwork was posted by someone else, not Reviem. So, unless they stole it, it belongs to @/qwerty_axl
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
I think they're talking about the other artworks i posted and not specifically this one
silly goose
silly gooseā€¢2y ago
šŸ„¹šŸ„¹šŸ„¹šŸ˜€ šŸ«¶
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
I agree. Also AI software uses art by millions of artists to train its algorithm. Even tho the artists didnā€™t consent for their work to be used. Artist will thrive without AI, but AI needs to steal from real artists work to automate images.
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
Itā€™s not as much stealing as it is learning from other artistā€™s work which is what every human artist already does Iā€™ve explained how it works in the paragraph above This
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
Except every human artist actually draws and creates something from nothing which takes hours to do and constant learning and improving. A machine can do this in a couple of seconds and just copies and steals work from other artists. I donā€™t think itā€™s the same. A machine blatantly copying something or someone who actually needs to try to draw something. But thatā€™s just my opinion as an artist
Red
Redā€¢2y ago
AI images are not art because what defines art is the effort and not always the final outcome. For example, other forms of art are poetry, cooking, dance, makeup, music, etc. One thing all of these have in common is putting a lot of effort into making them (That's not to say you can't post these here -- but thats how I see AI "art") But I don't think anyone is trying to say AI Images are the same as genuine art either
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
I'm just surprised people talk about AI art without knowing how it actually works
syncopate
syncopateā€¢2y ago
based yeah but no one understands that because they dont draw most people do lol and if you think its skillful try sitting down with a pencil and paper and draw what you type yourself instead of being lazy
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
No one said it was skilful, but it is incredibly convenient. Also most people know how to use it. Not how diffusion models like stable diffusion, mid journey or dalle learn from data and reproduce samples
idlelikestaxevasion
Every price of art takes inspiration, not limited to ai
iiireiiireiii
iiireiiireiiiā€¢2y ago
ai doesnt take inspiration, it takes parts of other images to match your prompt
Reviem
Reviemā€¢2y ago
it doesn't take parts of any image It learns patterns just like a human brain If there are 10 images that contain apples, and each image is captioned as containing apples It will learn what an apple looks like That's how it works It doesn't just take parts of images and make a collage out of them
silly goose
silly gooseā€¢2y ago
no it doesn't
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
Yet you draw it yourself and not a machine who does it for you
syncopate
syncopateā€¢2y ago
^
Haasty
Haastyā€¢2y ago
what difference does that make Is coca cola produced from a machine no longer coca cola?
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
So you donā€™t see a difference drawing something with the hand or a machine who does it for you lol. And how is that a good example. Is coco cola handmade art?
idlelikestaxevasion
I do but ai art isn't stealing It doesn't intentionally Just like hand drawn art
syncopate
syncopateā€¢2y ago
the difference is that i have spent 3 or more hours doing one little art piece and people can just type words into a computer and do it in 20 seconds and say that we are on the same level
Lies
Liesā€¢2y ago
EXACTLY
maanski3
maanski3ā€¢2y ago
This is so cool!
speedy
speedyā€¢2y ago
Skrrr skibidi dop dop dop dop dop yes yes yes yes
silly goose
silly gooseā€¢2y ago
Skrrr skibidi dop dop dop dop dop yes yes yes yes
RAH Fan helo
RAH Fan heloā€¢2y ago
nice
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server