C
C#3y ago
Catto

Calculating square root of any number using a lower and upper bound that guesses towards solution.

how? ;-;
30 Replies
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
What have you tried?
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
The square root of x is calculated iterative using a lower and upper bound that represent guesses towards the solution. The lower bound is the last known value that the true square root must be above and the upper bound is the last know value that the true square root must be below
The square root of x is calculated iterative using a lower and upper bound that represent guesses towards the solution. The lower bound is the last known value that the true square root must be above and the upper bound is the last know value that the true square root must be below
Nothing, because im trying to figure out how would i achieve this: like i geniunenly dont get what lower or upper bound its asking for? and how id used it to find square root of any number
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
Ok. Let's say I tell you "give me the square root of 483269867. What initial bound do you think could mean / be?
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
well the next closeset square number that has a square root number close to that? so for example square root of 50, would have square root of 49 the next closest, which is 7^2 right?
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
Not quite. You're assuming you know about 7^2 What I was expecting is "the square root has to be between 0 and 483269867" Makes sense?
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
mhmmmm yes i guess
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
Well, not 483269867. 483269867 + 1. So basically, you know that it's above 0, and you know it's bellow V + 1.
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
hmm okay, so maybe between 483269867 - 1 and 483269867 + 1? that -1 is lower ound and +1 upper
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
No, it doesn't work for the lower bound.
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
smh
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
The square root is lower than V - 1
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
Ohhh okay true true
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
Let's compute the square root of 4.5 using the method, it will be simpler. You know it's between 0 and 5.5 (excluded) What you then do is you take a number between those, you square it. (do it (manually), I'm waiting)
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
wait why 5.5 and not like 5?
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
(Ideally, you would take the mid-point, not random) Any number higher by 0.25 would do I think.
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
ah ok fair enough, btw i think im onto something, so i then do 0 + 5.5 and divide it by 2, and then i square that and see how close i am to 4.5?
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
So yes, the bound can start at 0 and V + 0.25 Yup. If you're above, you move the upper bound to what you tried. If you're bellow, you move the lower bound to what you tried.
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
Holy crap, wait wait so oooooo
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
And you do it as long as Math.Abs(v1 - v2) > tolerance. (don't use these variable names, it's just for illustrative purposes)
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
mhmmmm i seee, so if its above 4.5.... then i try 0 + what i just tried / 2 and thne squared right?
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
Yup
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
Holy moly you a genius, id have never thought of that lol i couldnt find solutions to this anywhere as well
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
decimal target = 547M;
decimal tolerance = 0.00001M;
decimal lowerBound = 0;
decimal upperBound = target + 0.25M;

decimal currentAttempt;
decimal currentValue;

do
{
currentAttempt = (lowerBound + upperBound) / 2M;
currentValue = currentAttempt * currentAttempt;

if (currentValue < target)
{
lowerBound = currentAttempt;
}
else if (currentValue > target)
{
upperBound = currentAttempt;
}
}
while (Math.Abs(target - currentValue) > tolerance);

Console.WriteLine(currentAttempt);
decimal target = 547M;
decimal tolerance = 0.00001M;
decimal lowerBound = 0;
decimal upperBound = target + 0.25M;

decimal currentAttempt;
decimal currentValue;

do
{
currentAttempt = (lowerBound + upperBound) / 2M;
currentValue = currentAttempt * currentAttempt;

if (currentValue < target)
{
lowerBound = currentAttempt;
}
else if (currentValue > target)
{
upperBound = currentAttempt;
}
}
while (Math.Abs(target - currentValue) > tolerance);

Console.WriteLine(currentAttempt);
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
Oh holy crap you even made the code in like 10 seconds!
MODiX
MODiX3y ago
Yawnder#7904
REPL Result: Success
decimal target = 547M;
decimal tolerance = 0.00001M;
decimal lowerBound = 0;
decimal upperBound = target + 0.25M;

decimal currentAttempt;
decimal currentValue;

do
{
currentAttempt = (lowerBound + upperBound) / 2M;
currentValue = currentAttempt * currentAttempt;

if (currentValue < target)
{
lowerBound = currentAttempt;
}
else if (currentValue > target)
{
upperBound = currentAttempt;
}
}
while (Math.Abs(target - currentValue) > tolerance);

Console.WriteLine(currentAttempt);
decimal target = 547M;
decimal tolerance = 0.00001M;
decimal lowerBound = 0;
decimal upperBound = target + 0.25M;

decimal currentAttempt;
decimal currentValue;

do
{
currentAttempt = (lowerBound + upperBound) / 2M;
currentValue = currentAttempt * currentAttempt;

if (currentValue < target)
{
lowerBound = currentAttempt;
}
else if (currentValue > target)
{
upperBound = currentAttempt;
}
}
while (Math.Abs(target - currentValue) > tolerance);

Console.WriteLine(currentAttempt);
Console Output
23.388031024485826492309570312
23.388031024485826492309570312
Compile: 664.938ms | Execution: 36.923ms | React with ❌ to remove this embed.
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
that is hella impressive, btw what does the M stand for tho?
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
Ahhh i see that code is so much simpler than i thought it would have been ngl i thought i needed like tons of math
Yawnder
Yawnder3y ago
There probably are more efficient ways to compute that, but that's how I would do it based on the question you asked.
Catto
CattoOP3y ago
hey i wouldnt have thought of anything lol, so that will 100% do, especially when i couldnt find any solutions to this problem online

Did you find this page helpful?