MM+, manifest+, attributions, and more

We can make a thread to keep the MM+ discussion seperate if you'd like
17 Replies
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
Yes relationship.conflicts
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
It is
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
For reference, the properties of RelatedPackage
No description
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
Not yet, but eventually it might
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
Version 12+
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
But you should probably add support for the format used by core
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
I guess so We might want to add it to the M+ documentation even if it's not technically M+
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Daniel Thorp -uOttawa
authors, packs, languages, relationships
Unknown User
Unknown User3y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View

Did you find this page helpful?